Jakarta, IDN Instances – Seven younger Papuans arrested on suspicion of treason at this time are present process a verdict listening to on the Balikpapan District Courtroom, East Kalimantan. They’re additionally touted as political prisoners.
Nonetheless, the Head of the Public Relations Division (Kadiv) of the Nationwide Police, Inspector Basic Argo Yuwono, mentioned the seven detainees weren’t political prisoners.
“They’re purely felony perpetrators who triggered riots in Papua and particularly in Jayapura Metropolis,” Argo mentioned in a written assertion, Wednesday (6/17).
1. Many losses attributable to provocation dedicated by the seven prisoners
Argo mentioned, as a result of provocation carried out by the seven detainees, many Papuans suffered losses, each materials and materials.
In response to Argo, the small teams that held the demonstration allegedly intentionally developed the difficulty that the seven treason defendants have been political prisoners.
“Clearly they’re criminals. So, at the moment the authorized course of undertaken by them is in accordance with their actions, “he mentioned.
2. The Nationwide Police considers the seven Papuans to have dedicated treason
The 2-star basic mentioned the police had a cause to designate them as suspects. From the start, the Nationwide Police had collected proof to make the defendants treason.
“We hope that Papuan regulation enforcement is just not thought of a political situation. As a result of that is purely felony, “Argo mentioned.
Additionally Learn: Preliminary Trial of Makar Case in Papua, 7 Defendants Charged with 2 Makar Articles
3. Seven Papuans allegedly concerned in protests that led to violence
Beforehand, seven younger folks from Papua have been prosecuted for allegedly concerned in protests that led to violence in Jayapura, in mid-2019. Their authorized course of then continued, till the trial on the Balikpapan District Courtroom.
The seven defendants included the previous Chair of the Cenderawasih College Pupil Govt Board (BEM) Ferry Kombo who have been sentenced to 10 years in jail, Chairman of the BEM of Jayapura College of Science and Know-how Alex Gobay demanded 10 years in jail, Hengky Hilapok was demanded 5 years in jail, and Irwanus Urobmabin was demanded 5 years in jail jail 12 months.
Then, Buchtar Tabuni was demanded 17 years in jail, Chairman of the Mimika West Papua Nationwide Committee (KNPB) Steven Itlay demanded 15 years in jail, and KNPB Basic Chairman Agus Kossay was demanded 15 years in jail.
Of their expenses, they have been confirmed legally and convincingly of committing felony offenses, as regulated in Article 106 of the Legal Code along with Article 55 paragraph (1) to 1 of the Legal Code within the first indictment.
4. The defendants are mentioned to be planning to name for the separation of Papua from the Republic of Indonesia in an illustration in Jayapura
Head of the Prosecutors Crew of the Papua Excessive Prosecutor’s Workplace Adrianus Y Tomana briefly described the treason case that ensnared Agus together with six of his colleagues. They’re mentioned to be planning to name for the separation of Papua from the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia (NKRI) in an illustration in Jayapura.
Proceed studying the article under
“Sure, the aim of the demonstration is to have the agenda to separate from the Republic of Indonesia,” mentioned the bespectacled man on 11 February.
Due to this fact, the seven Papuans have been charged with Article 106 and 110 of the Indonesian Legal Code for treason, with the specter of a sentence of ten years in jail. This indictment is just not with out foundation, Adrianus claimed to have pocketed proof and witnesses associated to this case.
Sadly, he was not prepared to disclose the proof and who these witnesses have been to the media crew. All proof and witnesses associated to this case will likely be submitted by his group within the trial later.
“Every file varies witnesses, there are 10 folks, there are seven folks, there are three professional witnesses. We’ll current the proof on the trial, “Adrianus mentioned.
5. Trial of treason circumstances is taken into account odd
Whereas on the inaugural trial final February 11, Latifah Anum Siregar as the top of the group of the seven defendants mentioned, there have been some irregularities within the case which ensnared his shopper. Certainly one of them is concerning the article, the place the prosecutor charged all his purchasers utilizing an alternate article, in order that the prosecutor was nonetheless hesitant in making use of the article to his shopper.
“If we hear the costs have been ready in an alternate manner. Now, if the indictment is ready in an alternate manner it implies that the general public prosecutor is just not positive which article was imposed, “mentioned the veiled girl.
Along with different articles, different irregularities are articles which might be utilized. Latifah mentioned, there have been 4 articles that the prosecutor had indicted to his shopper, particularly Article 106 regarding treason, Article 110 regarding conspiracy, Article 55 about inclusion, and Article 160 regarding incitement.
In response to the defendant’s protection group, the entire articles weren’t acceptable to be indicted by his shopper, as a result of his shopper had by no means completed what was charged.
“We’ll make the argument that the prosecutor is improper in making use of his articles. We argue the indictment is blurred, incorrect, “he mentioned.
6. Legal expenses in opposition to treason to college students from Papua are thought of a part of criminalization
Legal Regulation Skilled Abdul Fickar Hadjar mentioned treason felony expenses in opposition to college students from Papua have been a part of criminalization. As a result of, the definition of treason as referred to within the Legal Regulation Act (KUHP), has not been indicated by college students from Bumi Cendrawasih.
Fickar’s assertion responded to the add of a brief video circulating on social media, concerning the Chairman of the Cendrawasih College (BEM) Pupil Govt Physique (Uncen) Ferry Kombo, who claimed to have been sentenced to 10 years in jail, for coordinating anti-racism rallies in Papua.
“Makar within the Legal Code in Article 104 is an try and kill the president, Article 106 separates from the Republic of Indonesia partially or in entire territory, and Article 107 overthrows the federal government illegally or illegally,” Fickar mentioned when contacted by IDN Instances, Monday (8/6).
The Trisakti College lecturer mentioned, chanting “Free Papua” couldn’t but be known as treason.
“Sure (not a part of treason), as a result of it’s only an aspiration that may also be fought legally by parliament. Likewise, there has not been any experiment within the space separation. So it’s only an aspiration, “he mentioned.
Fickar mentioned, if a sign of treason didn’t happen, then what regulation enforcement did was together with criminalization.
“If it solely states opinions concerning the administration of a rustic, it isn’t treason. Within the context of the rule of regulation democracy, that features freedom of expression of ideas and opinions, “he mentioned.
“So it is ridiculous if people who find themselves critically prosecuted are known as criminalized by a paranoid regime,” Fickar added.
Additionally Learn: Precisely the Former Chairman of BEM Uncen Cs Sued for Makar Article?